The Impact of Culturing the Organ Preservation Fluid on Solid Organ Transplantation: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

TitleThe Impact of Culturing the Organ Preservation Fluid on Solid Organ Transplantation: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsOriol I, N S, Càmara J, Berbel D, Ballesteros MA, Escudero R, Lopez-Medrano F, Linares L, Len O, Silva JT, Oliver E, Soldevila L, Pérez-Recio S, Guillem LL, Camprubí D, LLadó L, Manonelles A, González-Costello J, Domínguez MA, Fariñas MC, Lavid N, González-Rico C, Garcia-Cuello L, F Revillas Ad, Fortún J, Aguado JM, Jimenez-Romero C, Bodro M, Almela M, Paredes D, Moreno A, Pérez-Cameo C, Muñoz-Sanz A, Blanco-Fernández G, Cabo-González JA, García-López JL, Nuño E, Carratala J
Volume6
Issue6
Abstract

Background: We analyzed the prevalence, etiology, and risk factors of culture-positive preservation fluid and their impact on the management of solid organ transplant recipients.

Methods: From July 2015 to March 2017, 622 episodes of adult solid organ transplants at 7 university hospitals in Spain were prospectively included in the study.

Results: The prevalence of culture-positive preservation fluid was 62.5% (389/622). Nevertheless, in only 25.2% (98/389) of the cases were the isolates considered "high risk" for pathogenicity. After applying a multivariate regression analysis, advanced donor age was the main associated factor for having culture-positive preservation fluid for high-risk microorganisms. Preemptive antibiotic therapy was given to 19.8% (77/389) of the cases. The incidence rate of preservation fluid-related infection was 1.3% (5 recipients); none of these patients had received preemptive therapy. Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid receiving preemptive antibiotic therapy presented both a lower cumulative incidence of infection and a lower rate of acute rejection and graft loss compared with those who did not have high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid. After adjusting for age, sex, type of transplant, and prior graft rejection, preemptive antibiotic therapy remained a significant protective factor for 90-day infection.

Conclusions: The routine culture of preservation fluid may be considered a tool that provides information about the contamination of the transplanted organ. Preemptive therapy for SOT recipients with high-risk culture-positive preservation fluid may be useful to avoid preservation fluid-related infections and improve the outcomes of infection, graft loss, and graft rejection in transplant patients.

DOI10.1093/ofid/ofz180
Alternate JournalOpen Forum Infect Dis
Notify Library Reference ID5112

Related Incidents