Single Center Series: Prostate Cancer in Living Kidney Donors (2019)

Status: 
Ready to upload
Record number: 
2071
Adverse Occurrence type: 
MPHO Type: 
Estimated frequency: 
Most recent risk assessment for prostate cancer (Council of Europe, 2022): If Gleason score is available, e.g., prostate diagnostics have been initiated a few days before organ procurement, then small intra-prostatic, low-grade (Gleason score ≤ 6) tumours are considered minimal-risk; intra-prostatic tumours with Gleason score 7 are considered low-to-intermediate risk; and intra-prostatic (pT2c) tumours with Gleason score > 7 are considered high-risk. Histological examination of the entire prostate with a valid grading of the tumour is time-consuming and the results might not always be available before an organ is transplanted. Donors with extra-prostatic tumour extension should be unequivocally excluded from the donation process as an unacceptable risk. Prostate cancer in the donor history: The acceptable time intervals for complete remission of prostate cancer are strongly correlated with stage and Gleason grade of the tumour. Donors with a history of curatively treated prostate cancer ≤ pT2 (tumour confined to prostate) and Gleason 3 + 3, as well as donors with very small prostate cancers and Gleason 3 + 3 under ‘active surveillance’, can be accepted for organ donation as minimal transmission risk at any time after diagnosis with the prerequisite of a frequently performed and non-suspicious follow-up. Prostate cancer < pT2 (confined to the prostate) and Gleason grade < 7 after curative treatment and cancer-free period > 5 years is considered minimal-risk. Higher stages/grades and/or shorter cancer-free periods require an individual risk assessment. A history of extra-¬prostatic tumour extension poses a high risk for transmission. In any case, current PSA values should be obtained to compare to former ones and to assess the actual situation.
Time to detection: 
N/A: No transmission with followup periods of 6.1, 7.8 and 9.6 years
Alerting signals, symptoms, evidence of occurrence: 
None
Demonstration of imputability or root cause: 
Retrospective study of living kidney donors with prostate cancer; no cancer transmissions documented.
Imputability grade: 
Not Assessable
Groups audience: 
Suggest new keywords: 
Malignancy
Single center series
Donor cancer without transmission
Living donor
Kidney transplant
Prostate adenocarcinoma
Prostate cancer
Treatment discussed
Suggest references: 
Hata K, Iizuka J, Hashimoto Y, Takagi T, Kondo T, Omoto K, et al. Follow-up Survey of Donor Candidates for Living Related Kidney Transplantation With Prostate Cancer. Transplant Proc. 2018;50(8):2338-41.
Note: 
The paper focuses on donors, only mentioning the transplants were done. Given the long donor followup and success of the transplant, we are left to presume that no transmission occurred, which seems perfectly reasonable, but I do not see it stated anywhere that tumor was not transmitted, so technically it remains a presumption one the reader's part. I changed the imputability grade to not assessable, but you can change it back to excluded if you feel more appropriate. I left donor cancer without transmission in the keywords and risk of harm in the checkboxes. I was incorrect the first time around, they had tumor before donation, not afterward. MN 5/11/22 Second review K. Moench 05/11/22
Expert comments for publication: 
Small study of living kidney donors who were incidentally diagnosed with prostate cancer during donation work-up. Although 7 patients are discussed, only 3 (#1,2,7) actually donated one year after prostatectomy and exclusion of biochemical recurrence. In each of these the Gleason score was 3+4 or 4+3 and D'Amico risk classification low to intermediate risk. Although the numbers are small they are compatible with the general published experience with donor prostate cancer. The study focuses on the donors and donor followup. It is mentioned that the kidneys engrafted in all cases, but specific followup details of the recipients is not provided, i.e., it is implied, but not explicitly stated, that there were no tumor transmissions.